Bytes to KiB

Agent readability score

Strengths

• Some tools (e.g., 'bytes-kib', 'utc-time') have clear, descriptive names aligned with their purpose.

Weaknesses

• Tool names are often ambiguous or cryptic (e.g., 'agent-tool-index', 'wiki-title-ok')
• Descriptions fail to explain usage context, only stating functionality
• All tools share identical optional parameters with no indication of relevance
• Significant tool overlap (e.g., 'browser-url-ok' vs 'playwright-url-ok')
• No error handling or constraint documentation in any tool descriptions

• bytes-kib — Name is clear but description lacks context
• utc-time — Name is clear but description lacks context
• timezone — Name is clear but description lacks context
• validate-json — Parameters include irrelevant fields like 'city'
• normalize-url — Parameters include irrelevant fields like 'zone'
• inspect-robots — Parameters include irrelevant fields like 'feed'
• domain-shape — Parameters include irrelevant fields like 'query'
• citation — Parameters include irrelevant fields like 'ref'
• compatibility — Parameters include irrelevant fields like 'path'
• status-catalog — Parameters include irrelevant fields like 'host'

Verdict

The toolset suffers from poor design with ambiguous names, overlapping functions, and uniform parameters that obscure relevance. While some tools have clear names, the lack of contextual descriptions and parameter specificity makes them difficult for an agent to use effectively.

9/13/2026, 1:01:58 AM

Event narrative