Bytes to MiB

Agent readability score

Strengths

• Tool names generally align with their primary function (e.g., 'bytes-mib', 'validate-json')
• Consistent parameter structure across all tools for uniformity

Weaknesses

• Descriptions fail to explain when tools should be used, only what they do
• All parameters are generic and optional with no context-specific requirements
• 12 tools share identical parameter sets with no clear differentiation
• No error handling or constraint documentation in any tool descriptions

• bytes-mib — Name matches purpose but lacks context for parameter usage
• utc-time — Description doesn't explain when to use this vs timezone tool
• browser-url-ok — Duplicates functionality with playwright-url-ok tool
• web-fetch — Shares parameters with fetch-status but has different purpose
• agent-tool-index — Critical tool discovery function lacks parameter usage guidance

Verdict

The toolset has poor usability for agents due to overlapping functions, generic parameters, and missing use-case context. While parameter consistency is a strength, the lack of clear differentiation between tools and absence of error handling documentation makes it difficult for an agent to select and use the correct tool effectively.

9/13/2026, 1:07:03 AM

Event narrative

Server compliance score remained stable at 100 during legacy era with no changes detected.

Risk: low

Advice

Maintain current configuration as compliance is stable. Monitor smokeOk status for potential issues.