Atom feed shape, body discarded

Agent readability score

Strengths

• Some tools have clear, specific purposes (e.g., 'validate-json', 'normalize-url').
• Consistent parameter structure across all tools.

Weaknesses

• Tool names are vague or non-descriptive (e.g., 'atom-ok', 'utc-time').
• Descriptions often repeat the tool name without explaining use cases or context.
• All parameters are marked as optional, with no clear distinction between required and optional fields.
• High overlap between tools with similar functions (e.g., 'browser-url-ok' vs. 'playwright-url-ok').
• No documentation of error handling, constraints, or edge cases.

• atom-ok — Name and description are identical, providing no actionable context.
• utc-time — Description lacks context for when/why to use it.
• timezone — No differentiation from 'utc-time' in functionality or use case.
• web-fetch — Duplicates 'fetch-status' functionality without clear distinction.
• browser-url-ok — Overlaps with 'playwright-url-ok' and 'file-path-ok' in purpose.

Verdict

The toolset suffers from poor naming conventions, ambiguous descriptions, and excessive overlap between functions. The lack of clear parameter requirements and error handling documentation further reduces usability for an LLM agent, justifying the 45/100 score.

9/13/2026, 12:20:06 AM

Event narrative

Legacy system shows perfect compliance with no issues detected.

Risk: low

Advice

Monitor compliance score for changes. Ensure legacy era stability. No immediate action required.