crate metadata name shape, body discarded

Agent readability score

Strengths

• Consistent parameter naming across all tools (e.g., 'url', 'json', 'host').
• Some tools have clear, descriptive names (e.g., 'validate-json', 'normalize-url').

Weaknesses

• Tool names like 'crate-ok' or 'utc-time' are vague and do not clearly indicate their purpose.
• Descriptions often repeat the tool name without explaining usage context or scenarios.
• All tools share identical parameters with no indication of required/optional fields (all are marked 'required': false).
• High overlap between tools (e.g., multiple URL/path analysis tools) creates selection ambiguity.
• No error handling, constraints, or failure scenarios are documented in any tool descriptions.

• crate-ok — Name and description provide no context for usage or purpose.
• timezone — Description lacks context for when/why to use this tool.
• web-fetch — Parameters are all optional with no guidance on required inputs.
• github-repo-shape — Overlaps with 'domain-shape' and 'figma-url-shape' in URL parsing functionality.
• validate-json — Description mentions discarding the body but provides no error handling details.

Verdict

The toolset suffers from poor naming consistency, ambiguous descriptions, and excessive parameter overlap. While parameter uniformity is consistent, it creates confusion rather than clarity. The lack of error documentation and usage context makes it difficult for an agent to select and use tools effectively.

9/13/2026, 4:45:37 AM

Event narrative