Ascii85 frame shape, input discarded

Agent readability score

Strengths

• Some tools have descriptive names (e.g., 'utc-time', 'validate-json')
• Consistent parameter structure across all tools

Weaknesses

• Tool names are vague or ambiguous (e.g., 'ascii85-ok', 'agent-tool-index')
• Descriptions are generic and fail to explain use cases or context
• All parameters are optional with no clear differentiation between tools
• Multiple tools perform similar functions (e.g., 'browser-url-ok' vs 'playwright-url-ok')
• No error handling or constraint documentation

• ascii85-ok — Name and description provide no context for usage
• timezone — Description lacks explanation of when to use it
• normalize-url — Parameter list identical to other tools with no differentiation
• fetch-status — Overlaps with 'web-fetch' but lacks clear functional distinction
• agent-tool-index — Description contains internal references (e.g., 'start_here.hop')

Verdict

The toolset suffers from poor naming conventions, ambiguous descriptions, and functional overlaps that would confuse an agent. While parameter consistency is maintained, the lack of clear differentiation between tools and absence of error documentation make the system difficult to use effectively.

9/13/2026, 12:15:36 AM

Event narrative

Legacy era Ascii85 frame shows 100% compliance, no smoke data available.

Risk: low

• 2026-09-12T15:21:42.024Z — era changed to legacy with complianceScore 100 · stable legacy operation but missing smoke validation

Advice

Investigate smokeOk null status as it indicates missing validation. Maintain legacy era compliance at 100% through regular system checks.