Ascii85 length, input discarded

Agent readability score

Strengths

• Some tools have clear names (e.g., 'utc-time', 'validate-json') that hint at their purpose.

Weaknesses

• Tool names are often vague or non-descriptive (e.g., 'agent-tool-index', 'people-search-index').
• Descriptions focus on what the tool does rather than when/why to use it.
• All tools share identical parameters (zone, json, url, etc.) with no clear relevance to their function.
• No documentation of error handling, constraints, or input validation.
• High overlap between tools (e.g., multiple URL/JSON tools with similar discard behaviors).

• base85-ok — Name and description provide no context for usage scenarios.
• timezone — Parameters include irrelevant fields like 'feed' and 'ref'.
• web-fetch — Duplicates functionality with 'fetch-status' and 'normalize-url'.

Verdict

The toolset suffers from poor naming conventions, redundant parameters, and lack of usage guidance. While some tools have clear purposes, the uniform parameter structure and minimal documentation make it difficult for an agent to select and use the correct tool effectively, justifying the 45/100 score.

9/13/2026, 12:36:49 AM

Event narrative

No changes detected; all metrics remain stable.

Risk: low

Advice

Continue monitoring for future changes. Current compliance and status are stable, indicating no immediate issues.