content-address hex length, value discarded

Agent readability score

Strengths

• Some tools have clear, descriptive names (e.g., 'validate-json', 'utc-time') that align with their purpose.

Weaknesses

• Most tool names are vague or non-descriptive (e.g., 'contentid-ok', 'agent-tool-index'), making it unclear what they do.
• Descriptions are overly generic or repetitive (e.g., 'value discarded', 'body discarded'), failing to explain use cases or context.
• All tools share identical, optional parameters (zone, json, url, etc.), creating redundancy and confusion about relevance.
• No tool differentiation or error handling is documented, leading to potential overlap and ambiguity in selection.

• contentid-ok — Name and description provide no actionable context for an agent to determine usage.
• utc-time — Description is clear, but parameter redundancy makes it unclear why this tool exists.
• browser-url-ok — Duplicates functionality with 'playwright-url-ok', causing selection ambiguity.
• validate-json — Description lacks context for when/why to use it despite being clear about output.

Verdict

The toolset suffers from poor naming conventions, redundant parameters, and unclear documentation. Agents would struggle to select appropriate tools due to overlapping functionality and ambiguous descriptions, aligning with the 45/100 readability score.

9/13/2026, 4:40:40 AM

Event narrative