Gregorian century band

Agent readability score

Strengths

• Some tool names (e.g., 'utc-time', 'timezone') clearly indicate their purpose.
• All parameters are consistently marked as optional, avoiding forced input requirements.

Weaknesses

• Tool names like 'century-n' and 'validate-json' are vague or non-descriptive.
• Descriptions often repeat the tool name without explaining use cases or context.
• Parameters share identical names ('zone', 'json', 'url') across all tools, creating ambiguity.
• High tool overlap (e.g., multiple URL/JSON/timezone-related tools) causes selection confusion.
• No error handling, constraints, or failure scenarios are documented.

• century-n — Name does not clearly indicate purpose or usage context
• validate-json — Description lacks explanation of when/why to use the tool
• normalize-url — Parameter names overlap with other tools, creating ambiguity
• inspect-robots — No documentation of error cases for invalid URLs
• iana-zones — Description does not clarify how timezone names are categorized

Verdict

The toolset suffers from poor naming conventions, ambiguous descriptions, and excessive parameter overlap. While some tools have clear purposes, the lack of distinctiveness and error documentation makes it difficult for an agent to select and use tools effectively, aligning with the 45/100 readability score.

9/13/2026, 4:16:35 AM

Event narrative