ISO country WS

Agent readability score

Strengths

• Some tools have clear, specific functions (e.g., 'validate-json')

Weaknesses

• Tool names are vague and non-descriptive
• Descriptions lack context for when to use tools
• All parameters are optional with no clear required fields
• High redundancy between tools with similar purposes
• No error handling or constraints documented

• cc-ws — Name does not clearly indicate ISO country code purpose
• utc-time — Description lacks context for when to use time-related functions
• timezone — Redundant parameters with no required fields specified
• normalize-url — Similar functionality to 'browser-url-ok' creates tool ambiguity
• web-fetch — Lacks error handling documentation for failed requests

Verdict

The toolset suffers from poor design with vague naming, redundant parameters, and lack of usage context. The high number of similar tools creates ambiguity for agents trying to select the appropriate tool, which aligns with the 40/100 readability score.

9/13/2026, 4:11:20 AM

Event narrative

Server remained stable with 100% compliance in legacy era.

Risk: low

• 2026-09-12T15:21:42.024Z — No change in complianceScore (100) or smokeOk (null) · Stable operation within expected parameters
• 2026-09-12T19:27:29.548Z — No change in complianceScore (100) or smokeOk (null) · Continued stable operation without deviations

Advice

Maintain current configurations as compliance is fully met. Continue monitoring for any future parameter changes.