ISO country TO

Agent readability score

Strengths

• Some tools (e.g., 'validate-json', 'normalize-url') have clear, specific functions that align with common data-processing tasks.

Weaknesses

• Tool names are generic and non-descriptive (e.g., 'cc-to', 'utc-time'), making it difficult for agents to infer their purpose.
• Descriptions focus on what the tool does rather than when/why to use it, reducing actionable context for agents.
• All parameters are optional with no clear required fields, leading to ambiguity in input expectations.
• High overlap between tools (e.g., 'browser-url-ok' vs. 'playwright-url-ok') creates confusion and potential tool selection errors.
• No error handling, constraints, or edge case documentation is provided in any tool's description.

• cc-to — Name is non-descriptive and duplicates server description
• utc-time — Name lacks specificity about time zones or use case
• timezone — Name is generic and overlaps with 'utc-time'
• validate-json — Parameters are ambiguous and lack required fields
• normalize-url — Overlaps with 'inspect-robots' and 'web-fetch' in URL handling

Verdict

The toolset suffers from poor naming conventions, redundant functionality, and unclear parameter requirements. Agents would struggle to select appropriate tools without additional contextual metadata or constraints.

9/13/2026, 3:56:26 AM

Event narrative

Server maintained consistent legacy era performance with no metric changes.

Risk: low

Advice

Continue monitoring for compliance score fluctuations. No immediate action required as metrics remain stable.