ISO country RU

Agent readability score

Strengths

• Some tools provide specific functions (e.g., 'validate-json', 'geo-hint') with clear purposes.

Weaknesses

• Tool names are generic (e.g., 'utc-time', 'timezone') and do not clearly indicate their specific use cases.
• Descriptions focus on what the tool does rather than when/why to use it.
• All tools share identical optional parameters (zone, json, url, etc.), making it impossible to determine relevance for each tool.
• Significant overlap between tools (e.g., 'web-fetch' vs. 'fetch-status', 'browser-url-ok' vs. 'playwright-url-ok') creates ambiguity for the agent.
• No error handling, constraints, or parameter validation details are documented.

• cc-ru — Tool name is specific but description is redundant with server metadata
• utc-time — Generic name with no context for ISO country-specific use
• timezone — Ambiguous name; could refer to IANA zones or geographic regions
• web-fetch — Duplicates functionality with 'fetch-status' and 'lib-docs-hint'
• browser-url-ok — Redundant with 'playwright-url-ok' (same purpose, different implementation)
• agent-tool-index — Critical tool for MCP navigation but lacks clear parameter requirements

Verdict

The toolset suffers from poor naming conventions, parameter uniformity, and functional overlap, making it difficult for an agent to select and use the correct tool. While some individual tools have clear purposes, the overall design lacks clarity and specificity required for effective agent operation.

9/13/2026, 3:30:39 AM

Event narrative