ISO country RE

Agent readability score

Strengths

• Some tools have clear, specific purposes (e.g., 'utc-time' for timestamps).
• Consistent parameter structure across all tools may aid in uniform processing.

Weaknesses

• Tool names are vague or non-descriptive (e.g., 'cc-re' vs. 'timezone').
• Descriptions often fail to explain use cases, only stating functionality.
• All tools share identical parameters with no differentiation in required/optional fields.
• Significant overlap between tools (e.g., 'normalize-url' vs. 'web-fetch') creates ambiguity.
• No error handling or constraints are documented for any tool.

• cc-re — Name does not clearly indicate ISO country code retrieval
• normalize-url — Shares identical parameters with 'web-fetch', creating ambiguity
• browser-url-ok — Duplicates 'playwright-url-ok' functionality with same parameters
• validate-json — Description lacks context for when/why to use it
• iana-zones — Name does not clearly indicate timezone listing purpose

Verdict

The toolset suffers from poor naming conventions, identical parameter structures across all tools, and overlapping functionalities that make selection ambiguous. While the consistent parameter format may aid in processing, the lack of distinctiveness in tool identities and use-case explanations will hinder an agent's ability to select and use the correct tool for a given task.

9/13/2026, 3:36:19 AM

Event narrative