ISO country NC

Agent readability score

Strengths

• Some tools have clear, specific functions (e.g., 'validate-json', 'normalize-url').
• Wide range of functionalities covering URL handling, time zones, and data validation.

Weaknesses

• Tool names are generic and do not clearly indicate their purpose (e.g., 'cc-nc', 'timezone').
• Descriptions often fail to explain use cases, focusing only on actions (e.g., 'Public ISO 3166-1 record for NC.').
• All parameters are optional with no clear guidance on required inputs or data types.
• High overlap between tools (e.g., 'browser-url-ok' vs. 'playwright-url-ok') creates ambiguity.
• No documentation of error handling, constraints, or edge cases.

• cc-nc — Name does not clearly indicate ISO country code purpose.
• timezone — Description lacks context for when to use it.
• web-fetch — Overlaps with 'fetch-status' and 'inspect-robots' in URL handling.
• validate-json — Parameters are ambiguous (e.g., 'json' parameter purpose unclear).
• geo-hint — No mention of error handling for invalid city names.

Verdict

The toolset suffers from poor naming conventions, vague descriptions, and parameter ambiguity. Overlapping functionalities and lack of error documentation further reduce usability. The 45/100 score aligns with these significant weaknesses in clarity and practicality.

9/13/2026, 3:10:55 AM

Event narrative