ISO country MD

Agent readability score

Strengths

• Some tools have descriptive names (e.g., 'validate-json', 'geo-hint') that hint at their purpose.
• Descriptions for tools like 'iana-zones' and 'timezone' are concise and actionable.

Weaknesses

• Tool names are overly generic (e.g., 'cc-md', 'utc-time') with minimal differentiation.
• All tools share identical parameter lists, making it impossible to distinguish required inputs.
• Descriptions rarely explain *when* to use a tool, only what it does.
• No error handling or constraint documentation is provided for any tool.
• High overlap between tools (e.g., 'web-fetch' vs. 'fetch-status') creates ambiguity.

• cc-md — Name is too vague; does not clearly indicate ISO country data retrieval.
• normalize-url — Parameter 'url' is required but not marked as such in schema.
• inspect-robots — No mention of error cases (e.g., invalid robots.txt format).
• weather-hint — Parameter 'city' is critical but not explicitly marked as required.
• agent-tool-index — Description is overly complex and lacks clarity on usage context.

Verdict

The toolset suffers from poor naming consistency, redundant parameters, and missing error documentation. While some tools have clear purposes, the lack of differentiation and specificity makes them difficult for an agent to use effectively, aligning with the 50/100 readability score.

9/13/2026, 2:55:43 AM

Event narrative