ISO country MC

Agent readability score

Strengths

• Some tools (e.g., 'github-repo-shape', 'normalize-url') have clear, domain-specific purposes.
• Parameters are consistently documented with explicit 'required': false flags.

Weaknesses

• Tool names are overly generic (e.g., 'cc-mc', 'utc-time') without clear intent or context.
• Descriptions are repetitive and fail to explain *when* to use tools, only what they do.
• All tools share identical parameter lists, creating confusion about relevance and specificity.
• No error handling, constraints, or edge case documentation is provided.
• High overlap between tools (e.g., 'web-fetch' vs. 'fetch-status') creates ambiguity for agents.

• cc-mc — Name provides no context about ISO country data retrieval
• utc-time — Description fails to explain use cases beyond timestamp generation
• validate-json — Discards input without documenting this behavior in parameters
• web-fetch — Shares identical parameters with 20+ other tools, creating ambiguity
• agent-tool-index — Critical hop instructions buried in description without parameter linkage

Verdict

The toolset suffers from severe naming and documentation issues that would hinder an agent's ability to select and use tools effectively. While parameter consistency is maintained, the lack of differentiation between tools and absence of error handling make the system unreliable for complex tasks.

9/13/2026, 2:55:18 AM

Event narrative