ISO country LB

Agent readability score

Strengths

• Some tools (e.g., 'validate-json', 'timezone') have clear, specific purposes.
• Consistent parameter structure across all tools may aid in parsing.

Weaknesses

• Tool names like 'agent-tool-index' or 'people-search-index' are overly generic and non-intuitive.
• Descriptions often fail to explain *when* to use tools, only what they do (e.g., 'normalize-url' lacks context for use cases).
• All parameters are marked 'optional' with no guidance on required inputs, making tool usage ambiguous.
• 12+ tools (e.g., 'web-fetch', 'fetch-status', 'normalize-url') perform overlapping URL-related tasks, creating confusion.
• No error handling, constraints, or failure scenarios are documented for any tool.

• cc-lb — Name is redundant with server context (ISO LB record)
• utc-time — Description lacks context for when/why to use it
• timezone — Parameters include irrelevant fields like 'json' and 'feed'
• inspect-robots — No mention of error cases for invalid robots.txt URLs
• web-fetch — Overlaps with 'fetch-status' and 'normalize-url' in URL handling

Verdict

The toolset suffers from poor naming conventions, ambiguous parameter requirements, and significant functional overlap. While some tools have clear purposes, the lack of usage context and error documentation makes it difficult for an agent to select and apply tools effectively, aligning with the 45/100 readability score.

9/13/2026, 2:48:13 AM

Event narrative