ISO country GR

Agent readability score

Strengths

• Some tools have clear, specific purposes (e.g., 'validate-json', 'citation').
• Parameters are consistently named and typed, though all are optional.

Weaknesses

• Tool names are generic and do not clearly indicate their purpose (e.g., 'cc-gr', 'timezone').
• Descriptions are often vague or redundant, failing to explain usage scenarios.
• High parameter overlap across tools creates ambiguity for the agent.
• No error handling or constraints are documented for any tool.
• Lack of differentiation between similar tools (e.g., 'normalize-url' vs. 'web-fetch').

• cc-gr — Name and description are identical to the server, providing no actionable context.
• timezone — Description mentions 'IANA timezone' but parameters do not include timezone-specific inputs.
• inspect-robots — No clarification on how 'group counts' are calculated or returned.
• geo-hint — Implies geolocation but parameters do not specify how location data is inferred.
• agent-tool-index — References external systems (Monid) without explaining integration details.

Verdict

The toolset suffers from poor naming conventions, redundant descriptions, and parameter overlap, making it difficult for an agent to select and use tools effectively. While some tools have clear purposes, the lack of error handling and inconsistent documentation undermines usability.

9/13/2026, 2:19:30 AM

Event narrative