ISO country GH

Agent readability score

Strengths

• Some descriptions clearly state the tool's purpose (e.g., 'Current UTC timestamp').

Weaknesses

• Tool names are generic and do not clearly indicate their purpose (e.g., 'cc-gh' vs. 'timezone').
• All parameters are optional with no context-specific guidance, making input interpretation ambiguous.
• High overlap between tools (e.g., 'web-fetch', 'fetch-status', 'citation') creates selection ambiguity.
• No error handling or constraints are documented for any tool.

• cc-gh — Name does not clarify ISO 3166-1 record purpose
• utc-time — No context for when to use this tool
• timezone — Parameters lack required fields for timezone-specific input
• validate-json — No explicit JSON input parameter defined
• normalize-url — Overlaps with 'citation' and 'web-fetch' in URL processing
• inspect-robots — No error handling for invalid robots.txt URLs
• agent-tool-index — Vague description of 'pay-per-call tool gateway' without usage examples

Verdict

The toolset suffers from vague naming, redundant functionality, and missing parameter specificity. While some descriptions are clear, the lack of required parameters, overlapping capabilities, and absence of error handling make it difficult for an agent to select and use tools effectively, justifying the 45/100 readability score.

9/13/2026, 2:14:53 AM

Event narrative