ISO country FI

Agent readability score

Strengths

• Some tools (e.g., 'cc-fi', 'iana-zones') have clear, domain-specific purposes.
• Consistent parameter structure across tools may simplify agent implementation.

Weaknesses

• Tool names are generic (e.g., 'utc-time', 'timezone') and do not explicitly reference FI context.
• Descriptions focus on functionality rather than use cases or triggers for invocation.
• All parameters are optional with no clear guidance on required inputs for specific tools.
• High redundancy between tools (e.g., 'web-fetch', 'fetch-status', 'citation' all handle URL analysis).
• No error handling or constraint documentation in any tool descriptions.

• cc-fi — Name is specific to FI but description lacks context about FI-specific functionality
• utc-time — Generic name with no indication of FI relevance
• timezone — Ambiguous name; could refer to any timezone, not FI-specific
• validate-json — No clear FI-specific use case or purpose
• normalize-url — Redundant with 'citation' and 'web-fetch' in URL processing capabilities

Verdict

The toolset suffers from poor naming conventions, vague descriptions, and significant redundancy. The lack of FI-specific context in most tool names and the absence of error handling documentation make it difficult for an agent to select and use tools effectively, aligning with the 45/100 readability score.

9/13/2026, 2:07:27 AM

Event narrative