ISO country BV

Agent readability score

Strengths

• Some tools have clear, specific purposes (e.g., 'validate-json', 'geo-hint')
• Consistent parameter structure across tools

Weaknesses

• Tool names are vague and non-descriptive (e.g., 'cc-bv', 'agent-tool-index')
• Descriptions often repeat generic server metadata instead of explaining use cases
• All parameters are optional with no clear required/optional distinctions
• High tool overlap (e.g., 'browser-url-ok' vs 'playwright-url-ok')
• No error handling or constraint documentation

• cc-bv — Name provides no context about ISO country data
• utc-time — Description lacks context for when to use this tool
• normalize-url — Parameter list is redundant across all tools
• inspect-robots — No clarification on URL format requirements
• agent-tool-index — Complex description lacks clear usage scenarios

Verdict

The toolset suffers from poor naming conventions, redundant parameters, and overlapping functionality. While some tools have clear purposes, the lack of distinctiveness and documentation makes it difficult for an agent to select the correct tool for a given task, aligning with the 45/100 readability score.

9/13/2026, 1:41:23 AM

Event narrative

Server remained stable with no changes in compliance or status during the period.

Risk: low

Advice

Continue monitoring for any future deviations. Current stability suggests no immediate risk.