ISO country BR

Agent readability score

Strengths

• Some tools have clear names like 'validate-json' and 'utc-time' that hint at their purpose.

Weaknesses

• Tool names like 'cc-br' are vague and do not clearly indicate their function.
• Descriptions often repeat generic phrases without explaining use cases or constraints.
• All parameters are optional with no clear required fields, making input expectations ambiguous.
• High overlap in tool functionalities (e.g., multiple URL validation tools) creates confusion.
• No error handling or constraints are documented for any tool.

• cc-br — Name is too vague to infer purpose
• utc-time — Description lacks context for when to use it
• normalize-url — Parameters include irrelevant fields like 'zone' and 'feed'
• web-fetch — Duplicates functionality with 'fetch-status' and 'inspect-robots'
• agent-tool-index — Description is overly complex and lacks clear usage guidance

Verdict

The toolset suffers from poor readability due to ambiguous names, redundant parameters, and overlapping functionalities. Agents would struggle to select appropriate tools without additional context, aligning with the 45/100 score.

9/13/2026, 1:38:04 AM

Event narrative

Server remained stable with 100% compliance and no smoke issues during legacy era.

Risk: low

Advice

Continue monitoring for unexpected changes. Verify smoke test configurations as smokeOk remains null.