ISO country BG

Agent readability score

Strengths

• Wide range of functionalities covering time, URLs, JSON validation, and more.

Weaknesses

• Tool names are generic and not clearly tied to BG-specific tasks.
• Descriptions often lack context for when tools should be used.
• All parameters are optional with no clear guidance on required inputs.
• High overlap between tools (e.g., multiple URL validation tools).
• No documentation of error handling or constraints.

• cc-bg — Name is specific to BG, but description is redundant with server metadata.
• utc-time — Generic name with no indication of BG-specificity.
• validate-json — Description lacks context for when validation is needed.
• web-fetch — Duplicates functionality with fetch-status and other URL tools.

Verdict

The toolset offers broad functionality but suffers from poor naming conventions, overlapping capabilities, and inconsistent documentation. Agents would struggle to select the right tool without additional context.

9/13/2026, 1:33:07 AM

Event narrative

Server compliance score remained stable at 100 with no degradation detected between measurements.

Risk: low

• 2026-09-12T15:21:42.024Z — Initial measurement · Baseline compliance score of 100 recorded with no smoke detection
• 2026-09-12T17:24:09.166Z — No change in status · Same compliance score (100) and operational status (up: true) maintained

Advice

Continue monitoring for any changes in smoke detection status. No action required as compliance remains at optimal level.