ISO country BD

Agent readability score

Strengths

• Some tools have clear, specific purposes (e.g., 'validate-json', 'normalize-url').
• Presence of specialized tools for URL analysis, JSON validation, and time-related tasks.

Weaknesses

• Tool names are ambiguous or non-descriptive (e.g., 'agent-tool-index', 'people-search-index').
• Descriptions focus on function rather than use cases or context.
• All parameters share identical, vague definitions (e.g., 'zone', 'json', 'url') with no required/optional clarity.
• High overlap between tools (e.g., 'web-fetch' vs. 'fetch-status') creates ambiguity.
• No error handling, constraints, or edge case documentation.

• cc-bd — Name lacks context for ISO record usage
• utc-time — Description doesn't specify when to use it
• timezone — Parameter 'zone' type is too generic
• validate-json — No error case documentation
• normalize-url — Overlaps with 'citation' and 'web-fetch'
• agent-tool-index — Name is overly technical and unclear

Verdict

The toolset suffers from poor naming conventions, vague descriptions, and parameter uniformity that hinders agent decision-making. Overlapping functions and missing error documentation further reduce usability, aligning with the 45/100 readability score.

9/13/2026, 1:30:05 AM

Event narrative

No changes in compliance or status between measurements.

Risk: low

Advice

Continue monitoring for any future deviations. Current stability indicates reliable operation.