ISO country AF

Agent readability score

Strengths

• Some tools have clear names (e.g., 'validate-json', 'normalize-url') that hint at their purpose.
• Diverse functionality covers URL parsing, time zones, JSON validation, and more.

Weaknesses

• Most tool names are generic (e.g., 'timezone', 'web-fetch') without clear intent.
• Descriptions focus on what tools do, not when/why to use them.
• All parameters are optional with no clear required fields, creating ambiguity.
• High overlap between tools (e.g., 'web-fetch' vs 'fetch-status') causes potential confusion.
• No documentation of error handling, rate limits, or usage constraints.

• cc-af — Name lacks context beyond ISO country code
• timezone — Generic name with no clear differentiation from 'utc-time'
• web-fetch — Overlaps with 'fetch-status' and 'inspect-robots'
• normalize-url — Parameters include irrelevant fields like 'json' and 'feed'
• validate-json — Description doesn't specify input format requirements

Verdict

The toolset suffers from poor naming conventions, ambiguous parameter definitions, and functional overlap. While the variety of tools is comprehensive, the lack of clear documentation and contextual guidance will significantly hinder an agent's ability to select and use the correct tool for a given task.

9/13/2026, 1:21:37 AM

Event narrative

Server remains stable with 100 compliance score in legacy era, no changes detected.

Risk: low

Advice

Continue monitoring for compliance score fluctuations. No immediate action required as current status is optimal.