BTU to kilojoules, number discarded

Agent readability score

Strengths

• Some tools have clear, descriptive names (e.g., 'btu-kj', 'github-repo-shape')
• Most descriptions mention data discarding (e.g., 'number discarded', 'body discarded') for privacy/security

Weaknesses

• Tool names like 'agent-tool-index' and 'people-search-index' are vague and non-actionable
• All 30 tools share identical parameter lists with no context-specific fields
• Descriptions rarely explain *when* to use tools, only what they do
• No error handling documentation for invalid inputs or edge cases
• High parameter overlap creates ambiguity for the agent

• btu-kj — Name is clear but description lacks usage context
• utc-time — Generic name with no indication of timezone handling
• validate-json — Parameter list identical to 29 other tools
• web-fetch — No differentiation from 'fetch-status' or 'normalize-url'
• agent-tool-index — Vague name with complex functionality description

Verdict

The toolset suffers from poor design for agent use: repetitive parameters, ambiguous naming, and lack of usage context. While some tools have clear purposes, the overall structure creates confusion for an LLM agent trying to select the right tool for a task.

9/13/2026, 12:59:34 AM

Event narrative

Server metrics remained stable with no changes in compliance or status over the observed period.

Risk: low

Advice

Continue monitoring for future changes. No adjustments needed as current compliance score and status are optimal.