Bencode integer/dict prefix, input discarded

Agent readability score

Strengths

• Some tools have descriptive names (e.g., 'validate-json', 'web-fetch') that hint at their purpose.
• Uniform parameter structure across all tools ensures consistency.

Weaknesses

• Many tool names are vague (e.g., 'bencode-ok', 'think-steps') without clear intent.
• Descriptions are overly generic (e.g., 'input discarded') without explaining use cases.
• All parameters are non-required strings with no context-specific constraints.
• Redundant tools (e.g., 'browser-url-ok' vs 'playwright-url-ok') create ambiguity.
• No error handling or input validation constraints are documented.

• bencode-ok — Name and description provide no actionable context for agent selection
• utc-time — Description lacks context for when/why to use this tool
• timezone — Parameter 'zone' is ambiguous without IANA timezone examples
• normalize-url — Redundant with 'web-fetch' for URL processing tasks
• agent-tool-index — Critical tool discovery function lacks clear parameter requirements

Verdict

The toolset suffers from poor naming conventions, generic descriptions, and parameter ambiguity. Overlapping functionalities create decision-making challenges for the agent, while missing error handling documentation increases risk of misuse. The 45/100 score reflects these systemic issues in tool design and documentation.

9/13/2026, 12:44:23 AM

Event narrative