Base58 charset, input discarded

Agent readability score

Strengths

• Some tools have descriptive names (e.g., 'validate-json', 'utc-time')
• Descriptions occasionally explain usage context (e.g., 'agent-tool-index')
• Consistent parameter structure across all tools

Weaknesses

• Tool names are often vague or ambiguous (e.g., 'think-steps', 'geo-hint')
• Descriptions are generic and repetitive (e.g., 'input discarded' in 13 tools)
• No parameter specificity - all parameters are optional with no context
• Significant functional overlap between tools (e.g., 7 URL-related tools)
• No error handling or constraint documentation

• b58-ok — Name and description are identical, providing no context
• timezone — Description doesn't explain when to use it
• normalize-url — Shares parameters with 28 other tools
• web-fetch — Lacks specific constraints in description
• think-steps — Name doesn't indicate its templating purpose

Verdict

The toolset has significant usability issues due to vague naming, lack of parameter context, and functional overlap. While some tools have clear purposes, the overall design makes it difficult for an agent to select and use the correct tool for a given task.

9/13/2026, 12:24:49 AM

Event narrative

No changes detected in compliance score or status between measurements.

Risk: low

Advice

Continue monitoring for future changes. Current compliance score remains at 100 with no anomalies reported.