AVI RIFF check, file discarded

Agent readability score

Strengths

• Some tools have clear, specific purposes (e.g., 'validate-json', 'geo-hint')
• Descriptions occasionally mention data discarding behavior

Weaknesses

• Tool names are often vague or non-descriptive (e.g., 'think-steps', 'wiki-title-ok')
• All tools share identical parameter lists with no indication of required/optional fields
• Significant overlap between tools (e.g., 'browser-url-ok' vs 'playwright-url-ok')
• No error handling or constraint documentation
• Descriptions are frequently redundant or uninformative

• avi-riff — Name and description are identical, providing no additional context
• utc-time — Tool name doesn't clarify its purpose compared to 'timezone'
• normalize-url — Description doesn't explain when/why to use it
• agent-tool-index — Complex description lacks clear use cases
• people-search-index — Tool name doesn't indicate its relationship to 'agent-tool-index'

Verdict

The toolset suffers from poor design choices including ambiguous naming, identical parameters across all tools, and significant functional overlap. The lack of clear documentation and error handling makes it difficult for an agent to select and use the appropriate tool for any given task.

9/13/2026, 12:21:55 AM

Event narrative

No changes detected in compliance or status between measurements.

Risk: low

Advice

Monitor for future changes. Current compliance score remains at 100 with no anomalies reported.