:authority host:port shape, value discarded

Agent readability score

Strengths

• Some tools have clear names (e.g., 'validate-json', 'utc-time') that hint at their purpose.
• Descriptions occasionally mention data discarding (e.g., 'body discarded') for privacy/efficiency.

Weaknesses

• Tool names are vague or ambiguous (e.g., 'geo-hint', 'agent-tool-index') without clear intent.
• Descriptions focus on actions (e.g., 'Check whether a URL can be opened') rather than use cases or triggers.
• All tools share identical parameter lists (zone, json, url, etc.), making parameter relevance unclear.
• High overlap between tools (e.g., 'browser-url-ok' vs. 'playwright-url-ok') creates confusion for agents.
• No error handling, constraints, or failure scenarios are documented in descriptions.

• authority-ok — Name and description provide no context for when/why to use this tool.
• geo-hint — Vague name with no indication of geographic data type (latitude, city, etc.).
• web-fetch — Shares identical parameters with 29 other tools, making differentiation impossible.
• validate-json — Description mentions data discarding but lacks error handling for invalid inputs.
• agent-tool-index — Name implies a gateway tool but description lacks usage scenarios or constraints.

Verdict

The toolset suffers from poor naming conventions, redundant parameters, and overlapping functionality. While some tools have clear purposes, the lack of distinctiveness and contextual descriptions makes it challenging for an agent to select the correct tool for a given task. The absence of error handling documentation further reduces reliability.

9/13/2026, 12:21:26 AM

Event narrative