Australian postcode digit shape, value discarded

Agent readability score

Strengths

• Some descriptions briefly explain data discard behavior (e.g., 'validate-json')
• Consistent parameter naming across tools

Weaknesses

• Tool names are often vague (e.g., 'domain-shape', 'geo-hint')
• Descriptions rarely explain usage context, only basic functionality
• All parameters are optional with no clear required/optional distinction
• 30+ tools show significant functional overlap (e.g., multiple URL validation tools)
• No error handling or constraint documentation in any tool descriptions

• au-postcode — Name and description are identical, no usage context
• timezone — Vague description with no usage scenario explanation
• normalize-url — Parameter list identical to 28 other tools
• inspect-robots — No error handling documentation
• web-fetch — Overlaps with 'fetch-status' and 'browser-url-ok'

Verdict

The toolset suffers from poor naming conventions, excessive redundancy, and minimal documentation. The identical parameter lists across 30 tools create ambiguity, while the lack of error handling information makes them unreliable for critical workflows. The 45/100 readability score aligns with these significant usability issues.

9/13/2026, 12:20:57 AM

Event narrative

Server in legacy era with 100% compliance, smokeOk unreported.

Risk: low

Advice

Investigate null smokeOk value. Ensure legacy system maintenance. Monitor for era transition triggers.