ASCII byte length, text discarded

Agent readability score

Strengths

• Some tool names (e.g., 'validate-json') clearly indicate their function.
• Descriptions occasionally mention data discarding (e.g., 'text discarded') for privacy/transparency.

Weaknesses

• Most tool names are generic (e.g., 'utc-time', 'timezone') without clear differentiation.
• Descriptions fail to explain use cases, only stating what they do (e.g., 'ASCII byte length').
• All 30 tools share identical optional parameters (zone, json, url, etc.), creating ambiguity.
• No error handling or constraints documented in any tool's description.
• 14 tools perform URL validation/checks (e.g., 'browser-url-ok', 'normalize-url', 'web-fetch') causing functional overlap.

• ascii-len — Name and description are identical, providing no context for usage
• utc-time — Generic name with no indication of time zone handling
• timezone — Ambiguous name that could refer to multiple functions
• validate-json — Lacks explanation of validation rules or error formats
• normalize-url — Shares parameters with 28 other tools without differentiation

Verdict

The toolset suffers from severe naming ambiguity, parameter redundancy, and functional overlap. With identical parameters across all tools and no clear use case differentiation, an agent would struggle to select appropriate tools. The lack of error documentation and inconsistent naming conventions (some clear, most generic) further reduce usability, justifying the 45/100 score.

9/13/2026, 12:14:42 AM

Event narrative

No changes in compliance score or status between the two measurements.

Risk: low

Advice

Continue monitoring as no action is required. Ensure the system remains in the legacy era with full compliance.