ARIA role token charset, value discarded

Agent readability score

Strengths

• Some tools have descriptive names (e.g., 'validate-json', 'normalize-url')
• Descriptions mention data discarding for privacy/efficiency

Weaknesses

• 30 tools share identical parameter lists with no clear purpose differentiation
• Tool names like 'aria-role' are cryptic and non-descriptive
• Descriptions are often redundant (e.g., 'ARIA role token charset, value discarded')
• No error handling or constraint documentation
• High overlap between URL validation tools (browser-url-ok, playwright-url-ok)

• aria-role — Name and description provide no functional context
• utc-time — Shares identical parameters with 29 other tools
• validate-json — No clear required parameters for JSON validation
• normalize-url — Description lacks use case examples
• web-fetch — Duplicates functionality with fetch-status

Verdict

The toolset suffers from severe naming inconsistencies, parameter ambiguity, and functional overlap. While some tools have useful descriptions, the lack of clear differentiation between 30 identical-parameter tools makes agent decision-making nearly impossible. The 45/100 score aligns with these systemic issues in tool design and documentation.

9/13/2026, 12:12:05 AM

Event narrative

Status remained stable with 100 compliance score across two measurements.

Risk: low

• 2026-09-12T15:21:42.024Z — Measurement recorded · Baseline stability confirmed
• 2026-09-12T19:27:29.548Z — No change detected · Consistent performance maintained

Advice

Monitor for potential hidden issues despite perfect compliance. Consider checking smoke test configurations as smokeOk remains null.