Arcminutes to degrees, number discarded

Agent readability score

Strengths

• Some tools have clear, specific purposes (e.g., 'arcmin-deg', 'utc-time')
• Consistent parameter structure across tools may aid in some scenarios

Weaknesses

• Tool names are often vague or non-descriptive (e.g., 'agent-tool-index')
• Descriptions focus on input discarding rather than usage context
• All parameters are optional with no indication of relevance to specific tools
• High tool overlap with similar purposes (e.g., multiple URL validation tools)
• No error handling or constraint documentation

• arcmin-deg — Name is clear but description lacks usage context
• validate-json — Description focuses on input discarding rather than validation purpose
• web-fetch — Parameters include irrelevant fields like 'zone' and 'city'
• agent-tool-index — Vague name with unclear purpose for an agent

Verdict

The toolset suffers from poor design with ambiguous names, inconsistent parameter relevance, and lack of usage context. The uniform parameter structure across all tools creates confusion rather than clarity, making it difficult for an agent to select and use the correct tool for a given task.

9/13/2026, 12:08:40 AM

Event narrative

No changes in compliance score or status between measurements.

Risk: low

• 2026-09-12T15:21:42.024Z — No value change detected · Stable performance with full compliance
• 2026-09-12T19:27:29.548Z — No value change detected · Continued stable performance with full compliance

Advice

Monitor for future changes in smokeOk status. Confirm if null value is expected. Verify era remains 'legacy' as no transition occurred.