Ansible hosts group count, body discarded

Agent readability score

Strengths

• Some tools have clear, specific functions (e.g., 'validate-json', 'normalize-url')
• Consistent parameter structure across tools for uniformity

Weaknesses

• Tool names like 'ansible-ok' and 'utc-time' are vague and non-descriptive
• Descriptions often repeat the same generic text without explaining use cases
• All parameters are optional with no guidance on required inputs for each tool
• High overlap between tools (e.g., 'browser-url-ok' vs 'playwright-url-ok')
• No error handling or constraint documentation in any tool descriptions

• ansible-ok — Name and description are identical to server name, providing no actionable information
• utc-time — Description 'Current UTC timestamp.' does not explain when/why to use it
• timezone — Shares identical parameters with 29 other tools, creating ambiguity
• inspect-robots — Description mentions 'group counts only' but lacks context for agent decision-making
• agent-tool-index — Critical tool for discovery but description is overly complex and unclear

Verdict

The toolset scores 50/100 due to severe naming and documentation issues. Tools lack distinct identities, parameter requirements are unclear, and descriptions fail to explain use cases. The high overlap between tools creates decision ambiguity for the agent, while missing error handling documentation compromises reliability.

9/13/2026, 12:01:38 AM

Event narrative