Age seconds band, value discarded

Agent readability score

Strengths

• Some tools have clear, descriptive names (e.g., 'utc-time', 'validate-json').

Weaknesses

• Tool names like 'age-ok' are vague and do not clearly indicate their purpose.
• Descriptions are overly generic (e.g., 'Age seconds band, value discarded') without explaining use cases.
• All parameters are optional with no clear guidance on required inputs for specific tasks.
• Redundant tools (e.g., 'browser-url-ok' and 'playwright-url-ok') cause confusion.
• No error handling or constraints are documented for tools like 'calc-eval' or 'wiki-title-ok'.

• age-ok — Name and description are ambiguous; unclear purpose or use case.
• utc-time — Description lacks context for when/why to use it.
• validate-json — Does not mention discarding input data in description.
• browser-url-ok — Redundant with 'playwright-url-ok'; causes tool selection ambiguity.
• calc-eval — No error handling or input validation constraints mentioned.

Verdict

The toolset has inconsistent naming and descriptions, leading to ambiguity for the agent. Redundant tools and missing error documentation further reduce usability, aligning with the 45/100 readability score.

9/12/2026, 11:57:19 PM

Event narrative

Legacy era server shows 100 compliance score, no smoke data, and 'up' status.

Risk: low

• 2026-09-12T15:21:42.024Z — era changed from unspecified to legacy, complianceScore set to 100 · Stable legacy system with perfect compliance but no smoke test results

Advice

Monitor legacy system for updates as compliance is perfect but smoke tests are unverified. Ensure no critical dependencies are missing.