Acres to hectares, number discarded

Agent readability score

Strengths

• Some tools have clear names (e.g., 'acre-ha') that directly indicate their purpose.
• Descriptions consistently mention data discarding, which may align with privacy or security constraints.

Weaknesses

• Tool names are overly generic or ambiguous (e.g., 'validate-json', 'normalize-url') without clear intent differentiation.
• Descriptions fail to explain *when* to use tools, only what they do (e.g., 'Current UTC timestamp').
• All parameters are optional with identical names across tools (e.g., 'zone', 'url'), creating confusion about relevance.
• High tool overlap (e.g., 'browser-url-ok' vs. 'playwright-url-ok') risks agent indecision.
• No error handling, constraints, or edge case documentation is provided.

• acre-ha — Name is clear but description lacks context for usage scenarios.
• utc-time — Description is too brief to guide agent decision-making.
• timezone — Duplicates parameters with other tools without differentiation.
• validate-json — Ambiguous purpose compared to 'web-fetch' or 'inspect-robots'.
• browser-url-ok — Duplicates functionality with 'playwright-url-ok' and 'fetch-status'.

Verdict

The toolset suffers from poor naming consistency, overlapping functionalities, and insufficient contextual guidance. While some tools are clearly named, the lack of distinct usage scenarios and parameter specificity makes agent decision-making error-prone. The 45/100 score reflects these systemic issues in tool design.

9/12/2026, 11:53:26 PM

Event narrative

Legacy server shows 100% compliance, but smoke data is missing. No recent changes detected.

Risk: low

• 2026-09-12T15:21:42.024Z — Era changed to legacy with 100% compliance score · Full compliance achieved, but smoke status unknown

Advice

Investigate missing smoke sensor data. Consider migrating from legacy era for better monitoring. Maintain current compliance practices.