ACAO star-or-origin, value discarded

Agent readability score

Strengths

• Some tools have clear, descriptive names (e.g., 'validate-json', 'normalize-url') that align with their purpose.

Weaknesses

• Most tool names are vague or generic (e.g., 'acao-ok', 'utc-time'), making it unclear when or why they should be used.
• Descriptions are repetitive and often fail to explain use cases (e.g., 'ACAO star-or-origin, value discarded' for multiple tools).
• All parameters are identical across tools (e.g., 'zone', 'json', 'url') with no differentiation in required/optional fields or types.
• No error handling, constraints, or failure scenarios are documented for any tool.
• Redundant tools exist (e.g., 'browser-url-ok' and 'playwright-url-ok' perform similar functions).

• acao-ok — Name and description provide no actionable context for agent selection.
• utc-time — Description lacks explanation of when or why this tool is needed.
• timezone — Parameters are identical to other tools, creating ambiguity.
• validate-json — Description mentions discarding input but doesn't clarify validation criteria.
• normalize-url — Redundant with 'browser-url-ok' in URL processing functionality.

Verdict

The toolset suffers from poor naming conventions, repetitive descriptions, and lack of parameter differentiation, making it difficult for an agent to select the correct tool. The absence of error handling and redundant functions further reduce usability, justifying the 45/100 score.

9/12/2026, 11:52:31 PM

Event narrative