QuoteOS

Agent readability score

Strengths

• Tool names clearly indicate their primary function (eligibility check, auto/home quotes).
• Descriptions specify usage context (e.g., 'use this FIRST in any intake flow').
• Required parameters are explicitly marked for all tools.

Weaknesses

• Parameter names like 'fields_json' and 'auto_input_json' are generic and do not clarify expected data structure.
• No documentation of error scenarios, validation rules, or rate limits in tool descriptions.
• Tool descriptions do not explicitly state when to use one tool over another beyond 'first in flow' guidance.

• checkEligibility — Parameter 'fields_json' lacks schema definition for required data elements
• getAutoQuotes — Parameter 'auto_input_json' does not specify required fields or format
• getHomeQuotes — Parameter 'home_input_json' lacks schema documentation

Verdict

Tools are logically separated by function but suffer from vague parameter definitions and missing error handling documentation. The 'first in flow' guidance for checkEligibility is a strong design pattern, but lack of schema details will increase agent implementation complexity.

9/12/2026, 11:05:44 PM

Event narrative

No status change detected between measurements; compliance score remained at 100.

Risk: low

• 2026-09-12T15:21:42.024Z — Initial measurement: era 'dual', compliance score 100, smokeOk null · Baseline status established with full compliance
• 2026-09-12T19:27:29.548Z — No change: era 'dual', compliance score 100, smokeOk null · Status remained stable with no deviations detected

Advice

Continue monitoring for any future changes. The null smokeOk value suggests potential missing data that may require investigation.