Mes Frais de Notaire

Agent readability score

Strengths

• Tool names explicitly indicate their purpose (e.g., 'calculate_frais_notaire').
• No tool overlap; distinct functionalities for calculation, info retrieval, and comparison.

Weaknesses

• Descriptions lack context for when tools should be used (e.g., 'get_departement_info' doesn't clarify use cases).
• Optional parameters (e.g., 'type' in 'calculate_frais_notaire') may lead to ambiguous inputs.
• No mention of error handling or constraints in tool descriptions.

• calculate_frais_notaire — Optional parameters like 'type' and 'primo' lack clear guidance on default values or fallback logic.
• get_departement_info — Description doesn't specify scenarios where this tool is needed (e.g., property location analysis).
• compare_departements — No explanation of how to handle invalid codes in the 'codes' array parameter.

Verdict

The tools are functionally distinct and named clearly, but their descriptions lack contextual guidance and error-handling details, which lowers readability. The 70/100 score reflects clear tooling but incomplete documentation for agent decision-making.

9/12/2026, 9:50:53 PM

Event narrative

No change in compliance score or status between measurements.

Risk: low

• 2026-09-12T15:21:42.024Z — Compliance score remained 100, era 'legacy', up: true · Stable system performance with no detected issues
• 2026-09-12T17:24:09.166Z — No changes in compliance score or operational status · Consistent system behavior confirmed

Advice

Continue monitoring for any future changes in compliance score or operational status. No immediate action required.