ParaSure

Agent readability score

Strengths

• Clear intent in tool names (e.g., 'assess_weather_risk')
• Explicit demo warnings prevent misuse of real carrier integrations

Weaknesses

• Descriptions often omit specific use cases (e.g., 'Demo tool — request a simulated parametric quote' lacks context for when this would be used)
• No inputSchema details provided to clarify required/optional parameters
• Redundant 'demo' disclaimers across multiple tools cause conceptual overlap

• assess_weather_risk — Missing explicit parameter requirements (e.g., 'business location' format)
• get_parametric_quote — Vague use case description without specifying peril types or coverage period examples
• bind_policy — No clarification on required parameters beyond 'quote_id'
• check_trigger — Lacks details on input format for weather data simulation
• list_carriers — No explanation of how to interpret 'supported perils' or 'regions' data

Verdict

The tools provide clear demo boundaries but suffer from inconsistent documentation quality. While the first tool has a well-defined purpose, the demo tools lack specific use case examples and parameter definitions, which would hinder an agent's ability to make precise tool calls.

9/11/2026, 6:27:38 AM

Event narrative

Era changed to legacy with compliance score set to 100.

Risk: medium

• 2026-09-10T21:16:35.016Z — era was auth-gated, complianceScore was null · indicates pre-legacy configuration with incomplete compliance data
• 2026-09-11T05:44:28.819Z — era changed to legacy, complianceScore set to 100 · transition to legacy era with full compliance achievement

Advice

Monitor complianceScore stability in legacy era. Investigate why smokeOk remains null in both measurements. Verify if auth-gated to legacy transition aligns with expected maintenance schedules.