원불교 교서

Agent readability score

Strengths

• Tool names clearly indicate their purpose (e.g., 'list_books', 'get_passage').
• Descriptions explain specific use scenarios (e.g., 'search_scripture' for partial-text searches).
• Some tools include constraints (e.g., 'search_scripture' notes non-overlapping character limitations).

Weaknesses

• Parameter descriptions in 'lookup_dictionary' are ambiguous (optional parameters lack clear guidance).
• Some tool descriptions could explicitly define edge cases (e.g., 'get_related' lacks detailed error handling).
• Limited differentiation between 'lookup_dictionary' and 'get_related' in overlapping conceptual searches.

• lookup_dictionary — Optional parameters (q, id, section) lack clear guidance on required vs. optional usage.
• get_related — Description does not explicitly define how to handle non-matching conceptual queries.
• search_scripture — Limited explanation of how to handle ambiguous partial matches beyond '상시일기' example.

Verdict

The toolset is well-organized with clear naming and functional differentiation, but some parameters and edge cases require more explicit documentation to ensure agent reliability.

9/12/2026, 4:45:53 PM

Event narrative