https://triageshield.vercel.app/api/mcp ↗
Verify a vuln report's file/line/function claims against a real GitHub repo.
app.vercel.triageshield/triageshield is a remote MCP server published at triageshield.vercel.app. It has been probed 6 times since 9/14/2026. It answered in 6 of them (100.0%), a near-uninterrupted record. Median response time is 262 ms, placing it among the faster endpoints. It offers a narrow, focused set of 1 tools. On the protocol side it still runs 2025-11-25 and has not moved to the newer spec.
Can an LLM agent pick the right tool here — names, descriptions and parameter clarity are assessed.
check_vuln_report — Description cut off mid-sentence, leaving functionality unclear.| Run | Era | Modern | ms |
|---|
tools/list structure, inputSchema validity, and a functional smoke test — the components of the 0-100 score.
Tools the server advertised in the latest measurement — measured, not catalog-claimed.
check_vuln_reportVerify a vulnerability report's concrete, checkable claims (file paths, `file.py:123` line citations, function names) against a real GitHub repo's current default-branch state. Does NOT judge whether the described vulnerability is real or exploitable -- it only checks whether the files/lines/functions cited actually exist, which is the exact 'AI slop' failure mode (hallucinated specifics) that makes up a real share of auto-generated vuln reports. A PLAUSIBLE verdict means the claims check out, not that the vulnerability is confirmed real.
reportstringrequiredrepostringrequiredDerived by comparing consecutive probes — changes in era, protocol version, build and reachability.
Add this badge to your README — it updates automatically as measurements change.
[](https://mcpmetrics.io/servers/app-vercel-triageshield-triageshield)<a href="https://mcpmetrics.io/servers/app-vercel-triageshield-triageshield"><img src="https://mcpmetrics.io/badge/app.vercel.triageshield/triageshield/era.svg" alt="mcpmetrics"></a>You are seeing the last 7 days. Sign up for the full history. Which check failed and why is in the dashboard.
Sign up free to seeThe catalog entries whose name and description are closest to this one, found with the same index the search box uses.
Parse owner and repo from a GitHub URL. Path discarded.
Verify claims and sources, and check whether AI assistants name a brand.
Trending GitHub repos: new & rising daily. $0.01/query. Register in-session — free testnet funds.
Dive into the world of open-source with the GitHub Repo Explorer! Utilize the powerful GitHub
Real-time Korean business verification via NTS. 10 free calls/day, then pay-per-call (x402).
GitHub repository vectorizer and context synthesizer for RAG pipelines.
| Legacy |
|---|
| ms |
|---|
| Versions |
|---|
| 2026-09-14 14:41:53 | Legacy | 200 | 262 | 200 | 242 | 2025-03-26 |
| 2026-09-14 12:38:15 | Legacy | 200 | 261 | 200 | 250 | 2025-03-26 |
| 2026-09-14 10:35:25 | Legacy | 200 | 309 | 200 | 296 | 2025-03-26 |
| 2026-09-14 08:31:43 | Legacy | 200 | 215 | 200 | 201 | 2025-03-26 |
| 2026-09-14 06:26:32 | Legacy | 200 | 1525 | 200 | 1508 | 2025-03-26 |
| 2026-09-14 04:24:59 | Legacy | 200 | 268 | 200 | 256 | 2025-03-26 |
Each block is one measurement round. Green: working response. Amber: responded but the server was returning errors (5xx). Red: no response at all.
Each cell is one probe run. Faded cells are incomplete probes — one leg did not answer, so the era is inconclusive.
The two probe legs separately: modern server/discover and legacy initialize.
Comments
Sign in to write a comment
No comments yet. Be the first.