FairStash — Roblox trade values

Agent readability score

Strengths

• Tool names are descriptive and align with their purposes (e.g., 'check_trade' clearly indicates trade evaluation).
• Descriptions explain usage scenarios (e.g., 'search_items' clarifies use for ambiguous queries).
• Parameters are clearly labeled with required/optional status and data types.

Weaknesses

• Some descriptions are overly verbose, reducing readability (e.g., 'get_value' cuts off mid-sentence).
• Error handling/knowledge constraints are only explicitly mentioned in 'check_trade' (e.g., rejecting cross-game trades).
• Optional parameters like 'game' in 'get_value' vs. required 'game' in 'list_values' may cause confusion if not documented cohesively.

• get_value — Description truncated mid-sentence, missing critical info about 'date the numbers were col'
• check_trade — No explicit error handling for invalid item formats (e.g., non-existent items)
• list_values — Section parameter examples (e.g., 'godly', 'ancient') could be standardized in the schema
• search_items — No clarification on query length limits or fuzzy matching behavior

Verdict

FairStash tools are logically organized with clear intent and parameter definitions, but incomplete error documentation and verbose descriptions reduce usability. The absence of standardized parameter examples and explicit constraints in most tools creates potential ambiguity for agents.

9/14/2026, 8:37:50 AM

Event narrative