cryptoiz-mcp
https://mcp.cryptoiz.org/mcp ↗
Description
CryptoIZ MCP v4.16.17 — AI-powered Solana DEX whale intelligence. 9 tools (7 paid + 2 free): whale alpha scanner, divergence (hidden/breakout/classic), accumulation/neutral/distribution phase scoring, BTC macro regime, BTC Futures signal. Pay per call with USDC via x402 Dexter — gas sponsored, no SOL needed. Pricing: get_whale_alpha $0.10, get_whale_divergence $0.04, get_whale_accumulation $0.03, get_whale_neutral $0.03, get_whale_distribution $0.04, get_btc_regime $0.02, get_btc_futures_signal $0.06. Recommended: npx agentcash add https://mcp.cryptoiz.org
What our measurements say
cryptoiz-mcp is a remote MCP server published at mcp.cryptoiz.org. It has been probed 7 times since 9/10/2026. It answered in 7 of them (100.0%), a near-uninterrupted record. Median response time is 374 ms, placing it among the faster endpoints. It offers a narrow, focused set of 9 tools. On the protocol side it still runs 2025-11-25 and has not moved to the newer spec.
Agent readability score
Can an LLM agent pick the right tool here — names, descriptions and parameter clarity are assessed.
Agent readability score
Strengths
- Clear cost information for each tool is provided in descriptions.
- Presence of free tools (get_token_ca, get_status) adds value.
Weaknesses
- Tool names like 'get_token_ca' are ambiguous without context.
- Descriptions lack explicit use cases (e.g., when to use divergence signals).
- Parameter schemas and required fields are not detailed.
- Overlap between 'accumulation/neutral/distribution' tools creates ambiguity.
- No error handling or constraint documentation.
get_token_ca— Abbreviation 'ca' is unclear without full term (contract address)get_whale_divergence— No explanation of when to use hidden/breakout signalsget_whale_accumulation— No differentiation from 'neutral' or 'distribution' phasesget_btc_futures_signal— No mention of risk management for 35x leverage
Verdict
Event narrative
Risk: medium
- 2026-09-10T21:16:35.016Z — era changed from 'auth-gated' to 'legacy', complianceScore increased from null to 100 · transition to legacy era with full compliance score achieved
- 2026-09-11T01:59:45.474Z — smokeOk remained null · no smoke test results recorded in legacy era
Advice
Schema compliance
tools/list structure, inputSchema validity, and a functional smoke test — the components of the 0-100 score.
- tools/list schema valid
- inputSchema is valid JSON Schema
- Smoke test failed · last run:
- Cold-start: cold 224ms → warm 155ms (penalty 69ms)
Availability history
Event log
Derived by comparing consecutive probes — changes in era, protocol version, build and reachability.
- Server build: — → 4.16.4
- Supported versions: — → 2025-03-26
- Era changed: Auth-gated → Legacy
- Added to watch — era: Auth-gated
Get your badge
Add this badge to your README — it updates automatically as measurements change.
[](https://mcpmetrics.io/servers/aguskenari86-8bo7-cryptoiz-mcp)<a href="https://mcpmetrics.io/servers/aguskenari86-8bo7-cryptoiz-mcp"><img src="https://mcpmetrics.io/badge/aguskenari86-8bo7/cryptoiz-mcp/era.svg" alt="mcpmetrics"></a>You are seeing the last 7 days. Sign up for the full history. Which check failed and why is in the dashboard.
Sign up free to see